cropcircles.photos

A family of 2 diagrams bf81619cfa

2diagrams
2formations
4widest pair, bits
4joined within, bits

1966–1969 shape hash: a hash of the ink alone, cropped to its own bounds: a fingerprint of the design show this family in the grid

These are similarities between drawings, not between crop formations. Three sites drew them, to three conventions: cropcirclecenter.com redraws every formation in one editor's house style at one size, and the other two publish scans and photographs of many hands. Two diagrams that hash together may be one design published twice, one editor's habit, or the same drawing reused — the archive cannot tell you which, and a family here is never evidence that two formations are related.

The biggest families are the simplest designs. Two circles, three circles in a triangle, a ring inside a ring: a plain design has few ways of being drawn and every editor draws it much the same, so it gathers a large family. Size here measures how ordinary a shape is, not how surprising the repeat is — a family of two rare designs is the more interesting find, and it sits at the bottom of the list.

The shape numbers are experimental. M3-6b graded the element count right to within one on 97.5 % of a hand-labelled sample and the rotational order right on 88.8 % against a gate of 90 %, which the extractor did not meet; the ring count agrees with a reader on 35.9 % and is not calibrated at all. Read any number here beside the picture, not instead of it.

The diagrams

diagram of Middlebury Middlebury22 June 1966 · Middlebury

cropcirclecenter.com 1 element(s)≈ 2-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Van Horn Van Horn12 July 1969 · Van Horn

cropcirclecenter.com 1 element(s)≈ 2-foldsimilar shapes

Member by member

formationdateplacecountycropsite elementsringsrotationalmirrorstored size
Middlebury US19660622_A 22 June 1966 Middlebury grass cc 1 1 2-fold 1.00 575×415
Van Horn US19690712_A 12 July 1969 Van Horn soy cc 1 1 2-fold 1.00 575×415

The element count is right to within one on 97.5 % of a 161-diagram hand-labelled sample; the rotational order right on 88.8 % of a 197-diagram hand-labelled sample, against a gate of 90 %; the ring count agrees with a reader on 35.9 % — it is not a calibrated number.