cropcircles.photos the public record of crop formations, 1590–2026
view

Shape family · 13 formations · 1973–2003 · widest pair 10 bits apart

A family of 11 diagrams 8024283422

Every drawing here lies within 4 bits of another one in the group. It says the drawings look alike; it says nothing about the fields.

shape hash: a hash of the ink alone, cropped to its own bounds: a fingerprint of the design, matched in every orientation · show this family in the grid.

11diagrams
13formations
10widest pair, bits
4joined within, bits

These are similarities between drawings, not between crop formations. Three sites drew them, to three conventions: cropcirclecenter.com redraws every formation in one editor's house style at one size, and the other two publish scans and photographs of many hands. Two diagrams that hash together may be one design published twice, one editor's habit, or the same drawing reused — the archive cannot tell you which, and a family here is never evidence that two formations are related.

The biggest families are the simplest designs. Two circles, three circles in a triangle, a ring inside a ring: a plain design has few ways of being drawn and every editor draws it much the same, so it gathers a large family. Size here measures how ordinary a shape is, not how surprising the repeat is — a family of two rare designs is the more interesting find, and it sits at the bottom of the list.

The shape numbers are experimental. M3-6b graded the element count right to within one on 97.5 % of a hand-labelled sample and the rotational order right on 88.8 % against a gate of 90 %, which the extractor did not meet; the ring count agrees with a reader on 35.9 % and is not calibrated at all. Read any number here beside the picture, not instead of it.

The diagrams

Member by member

formationdateplacecountycropsite elementsringsrotationalmirrorstored size
Rambin DE20030628_B 28 June 2003 Rambin wheat cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 0.99 575×415
Kapuskasing CA19991333_A 1999 Kapuskasing cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 0.99 575×415
US19951333_D US19951333_D 1995 cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 0.99 575×415
Draguignan FR19810109_A 9 January 1981 Draguignan cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 0.99 575×415
Liverpool UK19900733_E July 1990 Liverpool cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 1.00 575×415
Endeavor Hill AU19891017_A 17 October 1989 Endeavor Hill grass cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 1.00 575×415
UK19731333_A UK19731333_A 1973 Wiltshire wheat cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 0.99 575×415
New Sarepta CA19920506_B 6 May 1992 New Sarepta grass cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 1.00 575×415
US19980413_A US19980413_A 13 April 1998 cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 1.00 575×415
Helena US19861333_B 1986 Helena cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 1.00 575×415
Karoonda AU19901333_A 1990 Karoonda cc 1 1 continuous (concentric circles) 1.00 575×415

The element count is right to within one on 97.5 % of a 161-diagram hand-labelled sample; the rotational order right on 88.8 % of a 197-diagram hand-labelled sample, against a gate of 90 %; the ring count agrees with a reader on 35.9 % — it is not a calibrated number.