cropcircles.photos

A family of 12 diagrams 64dca3f910

12diagrams
15formations
4widest pair, bits
4joined within, bits

1975–2008 shape hash: a hash of the ink alone, cropped to its own bounds: a fingerprint of the design show this family in the grid

These are similarities between drawings, not between crop formations. Three sites drew them, to three conventions: cropcirclecenter.com redraws every formation in one editor's house style at one size, and the other two publish scans and photographs of many hands. Two diagrams that hash together may be one design published twice, one editor's habit, or the same drawing reused — the archive cannot tell you which, and a family here is never evidence that two formations are related.

The biggest families are the simplest designs. Two circles, three circles in a triangle, a ring inside a ring: a plain design has few ways of being drawn and every editor draws it much the same, so it gathers a large family. Size here measures how ordinary a shape is, not how surprising the repeat is — a family of two rare designs is the more interesting find, and it sits at the bottom of the list.

The shape numbers are experimental. M3-6b graded the element count right to within one on 97.5 % of a hand-labelled sample and the rotational order right on 88.8 % against a gate of 90 %, which the extractor did not meet; the ring count agrees with a reader on 35.9 % and is not calibrated at all. Read any number here beside the picture, not instead of it.

The diagrams

diagram of Schiphol Schiphol16 May 2008 · Schiphol

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Selby SelbyAugust 1986 · Selby

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Cheesefoot Head Cheesefoot Head4 June 1988 · Cheesefoot Head

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Bratton BrattonJuly 1982 · Bratton

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Cheesefoot Head Cheesefoot Head4 June 1987 · Cheesefoot Head

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Corhampton Corhampton8 June 1989 · Corhampton

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Stonehenge Stonehenge1975 · Stonehenge

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Berwick St John Berwick St John16 August 1990 · Berwick St John

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Hinwil Hinwil1975 · Hinwil

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Curborough Curborough31 May 1998 · Curborough

cropcirclecenter.com 1 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

diagram of Bradford BradfordJune 1989 · Bradford

cropcirclecenter.com 3 element(s)≈ 3-foldsimilar shapes

Member by member

formationdateplacecountycropsite elementsringsrotationalmirrorstored size
Schiphol NL20080516_A 16 May 2008 Schiphol wheat cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Selby UK19860833_A August 1986 Selby Yorkshire cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Cheesefoot Head UK19880604_A 4 June 1988 Cheesefoot Head Hampshire wheat cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Bratton UK19820733_A July 1982 Bratton Wiltshire cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Cheesefoot Head UK19870604_B 4 June 1987 Cheesefoot Head Hampshire cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Corhampton UK19890608_A 8 June 1989 Corhampton Hampshire cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Narre Warren North AU19930808_A 8 August 1993 Narre Warren North cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Stonehenge UK19751333_D 1975 Stonehenge Wiltshire cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Berwick St John UK19900816_A 16 August 1990 Berwick St John Dorset cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Hinwil CH19751333_A 1975 Hinwil grass cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Curborough UK19980531_A 31 May 1998 Curborough Staffordshire barley cc 1 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415
Bradford UK19890633_A June 1989 Bradford Yorkshire cc 3 1 3-fold 0.97 575×415

The element count is right to within one on 97.5 % of a 161-diagram hand-labelled sample; the rotational order right on 88.8 % of a 197-diagram hand-labelled sample, against a gate of 90 %; the ring count agrees with a reader on 35.9 % — it is not a calibrated number.