Writer
It should not be long
1 document(s) about 1 formation(s)· 1 on cropcircleconnector.com
This signature is not in data/gazetteer/authors.json, so it stands for
itself: any other spelling of the same name has its own page. Only signatures on five or more
documents are curated by hand.
Signatures
| as printed on the page | documents |
|---|---|
| It should not be long | 1 |
Claims
5 claim(s) extracted by lexicon from this author's documents. A claim row records what the author wrote, with the sentence verbatim; it is not evidence about a formation, and nothing here is tested: the pre-registered tests of the testable types are build step M3-8, and they live in the analysis section. The precision column is what the lexicon's patterns for that type were measured at on 65 hand-labelled documents, so a count can be read against how often that type is matched wrongly.
| claim type | reported as | claims | measured precision | testable with this archive? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| comparison | comparisons | 1 | 0.70 | testable |
| authorship_et | authorship | 1 | — | not_testable |
| landscape | landscape | 3 | 0.90 | partly |
Up to 3 quote(s) per type, verbatim:
- “When approximately did he promise to return from the stars?”authorship_et · source page
- “Why did he draw a spectacular “feathered headdress” crop picture near Silbury Hill on July 5, 2009?”comparison · source page
- “This new “origami” crop picture was drawn as the “eye” of a large “serpent” shape in the landscape near Stanton Saint Bernard, to suggest that a metaphorical “flying or feathered serpent” can now see the “red rose” of victory”landscape · source page
- “Look closely and study please the remarkable landscape image shown below:”landscape · source page
- “Who was Quetzalcoatl the “feathered serpent”?”landscape · source page
Documents
| formation | date | kind | title | site | characters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanton St Bernard UK20210510_A | 7 June 2021 | article | ccc | 666 |
A document's date is the date its page carries, which for most comments is the formation's own date rather than the day the comment was written; the formation page states the basis for each one.