Writer
Graham T
1 document(s) about 1 formation(s)· 1 on cropcircleconnector.com
This signature is not in data/gazetteer/authors.json, so it stands for
itself: any other spelling of the same name has its own page. Only signatures on five or more
documents are curated by hand.
Signatures
| as printed on the page | documents |
|---|---|
| Graham T | 1 |
Claims
8 claim(s) extracted by lexicon from this author's documents. A claim row records what the author wrote, with the sentence verbatim; it is not evidence about a formation, and nothing here is tested: the pre-registered tests of the testable types are build step M3-8, and they live in the analysis section. The precision column is what the lexicon's patterns for that type were measured at on 65 hand-labelled documents, so a count can be read against how often that type is matched wrongly.
| claim type | reported as | claims | measured precision | testable with this archive? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| authorship_human | authorship | 6 | — | not_testable |
| landscape | landscape | 1 | 0.90 | partly |
| science | science | 1 | 0.71 | partly |
Up to 3 quote(s) per type, verbatim:
- “The supposed link to Jon Bonham had led to speculation that this must therefore be a man-made copy executed in some kind of homage to the long-deceased Led Zeppelin drummer.”authorship_human · source page
- “Still, taking all this into account, I approached the formation with some scepticism.”authorship_human · source page
- “This variation actually makes them harder to fake because it takes you further away from the tramlines.”authorship_human · source page
- “FIELD REPORT pictogram at Rushock, Worcestershire reported Saturday 15th July, visited Thursday 20th July”landscape · source page
- “He also felt that this formation was messy (I didn't agree) and that some others he had now seen aerial photos of were much more impressive in their geometry and symmetry.”science · source page
Documents
| formation | date | kind | title | site | characters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rushock UK20230716_A | 25 July 2023 | field report | FIELD REPORT pictogram at Rushock, Worcestershire reported Saturday 15th July, visited Thursday 20th July | ccc | 11,583 |
A document's date is the date its page carries, which for most comments is the formation's own date rather than the day the comment was written; the formation page states the basis for each one.